From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: From: David Presotto To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] iSCSI In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-fzakhswxnmkicaegysctovqelf" Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 15:13:08 -0500 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5de100a6-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-fzakhswxnmkicaegysctovqelf Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Don't deflate my sails! I was about to suggest eSCSI where each SCSI command is carried as a separate MIME attachment. --upas-fzakhswxnmkicaegysctovqelf Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.9.2]) by plan9; Thu Feb 13 15:09:27 EST 2003 Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by plan9; Thu Feb 13 15:09:24 EST 2003 Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.8.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id B5BAC19A68; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 15:09:09 -0500 (EST) Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: from mailrelay2.lanl.gov (mailrelay2.lanl.gov [128.165.4.103]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 60E5119A26 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 15:08:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from ccs.lanl.gov (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay2.lanl.gov (8.12.3/8.12.3/(ccn-5)) with SMTP id h1DK8HRV028289 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:08:17 -0700 Received: (qmail 9770 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2003 13:08:17 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO carotid.ccs.lanl.gov) (128.165.148.162) by 128.165.148.1 with SMTP; 13 Feb 2003 13:08:17 -0700 Received: (qmail 26811 invoked by uid 3499); 13 Feb 2003 13:08:16 -0700 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Feb 2003 13:08:16 -0700 From: "Ronald G. Minnich" X-X-Sender: rminnich@carotid.ccs.lanl.gov To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] iSCSI In-Reply-To: <009101c2d39a$9ae246a0$6501a8c0@kike> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:08:16 -0700 (MST) On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, matt wrote: > I expect that iSCSI has already hit your radar but here's the latest > > iSCSI Gets Go-Ahead Am I the only person in the world who can't figure out why anyone wants iSCSI? I just can't get it to make sense. My brain just won't go near it. ron --upas-fzakhswxnmkicaegysctovqelf--