From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Fri,  1 Aug 2014 21:25:06 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <af7eb948e40867ec77a84ab0371547b1@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <319fa107540a0694e461e23390e8414c@felloff.net>
References: <319fa107540a0694e461e23390e8414c@felloff.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] AMD A68-N5000 kabini mother
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0c10b0ce-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> cpu% paqfs /boot/bootfs.paq
> bootfs: Mon Jul 28 18:45:56 GMT 2014
> fingerprint: ce48b5387fa103247e64c81531fd49f129526c7a
> cpu% cd /n/paq
> cpu% du -n
> 70210	./386/bin/9660srv
> 161885	./386/bin/awk
[...]
[...]
> 0	./lib
> 3059482	.

cinap, how would you assess the tradeoffs in the 9front
boot process?  on the one hand, it is largely managed by
an rc script, but on the other, the rc script is fixed, and
not loaded dynamicly (such as via tftp) and a large number
of executables are hauled into the kernel.

- erik