From: Duke Normandin <dukeofperl@ml1.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 topology
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:32:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1101131518440.4272@fryrpg-zna> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <438932.84719.qm@web83907.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
>On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Brian L. Stuart wrote:
[snip]
> It has become a little confusing over the last 20 years. In a way
> too brief way, here are the basic incarnations of Plan9:
>
> - Natively running the current Plan9 kernel
> - Stand-alone terminal with its own fs
> - Terminal (possibly diskless) talking to an external fs
> - CPU, auth, or file server (or some combination)
>
> All of these are running Plan9 as their "bare metal" OS
>
> - Same as above but in a virtual machine, such as virtualbox,
> vmware, qemu, etc.
> - Ken's FS: a file server that runs on bare hardware
> - 9vx: a port of the Plan9 kernel to vx32 that allows a full Plan9
> system to run as a user-level application on another system,
> including Linux, FreeBSD, Mac OSX
> - drawterm: an earlier port of a limited Plan9 kernel that's similar
> to a terminal connecting to a remote CPU server
> - P9P (aka Plan9 ports, Plan9 from user space): a port of the Plan9
> user apps to POSIX-like systems
>
> And just for fun these can all play together. At the moment, I'm
> using a MacOS machine that has one file system mounted using the P9P
> 9pfuse program. It's also running an instance of virtualbox that's
> net booted a Plan9 terminal. There's also an instance of 9vx
> running which is accessing the file system mounted via P9P. All of
> these pieces are talking to a Plan9 CPU server which in turn uses a
> Ken FS file server.
I *know* that I'm going to get myself into trouble, hanging around a
bunch of Plan 9 hackers - like you seem to be :) My wife just made me
get rid of a bunch of P-IIIs that would have been great for this new
venture. Shoot!! (that's sh#t with 2 Os )
[snip]
> > I just checked - it's a 166Mhz P-I with 98M RAM and 4.5G HDD. Made
> > a good dedicated mail server. May not have enough gonads for a
> > Plan 9 server though. >
>
> I wouldn't dismiss it entirely. My old Plan9 CPU/auth/file server
> at home had a very similar configuration.
Then I'll have to give it a shot. Then go looking for some more recent
hardware! Here we go again ... :D
--
Duke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-13 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-13 18:38 Duke Normandin
2011-01-13 18:48 ` dukeofperl
2011-01-13 18:50 ` David Leimbach
2011-01-13 19:16 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2011-01-13 19:31 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-13 19:37 ` Jacob Todd
2011-01-13 19:44 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2011-01-13 20:08 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-13 21:01 ` Tassilo Philipp
2011-01-13 21:39 ` Brian L. Stuart
2011-01-13 22:49 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-14 3:27 ` blstuart
2011-01-14 4:02 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-14 4:18 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-14 4:04 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-14 0:00 ` Federico G. Benavento
2011-01-14 3:26 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-13 19:46 ` Bakul Shah
2011-01-13 20:11 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-13 19:40 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-13 20:07 ` John Floren
2011-01-13 20:24 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-13 20:40 ` John Floren
2011-01-13 21:37 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-13 21:59 ` Brian L. Stuart
2011-01-13 22:32 ` Duke Normandin [this message]
2011-01-13 23:18 ` John Floren
2011-01-14 3:42 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-14 4:03 ` John Floren
2011-01-14 4:05 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-14 4:15 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-14 4:22 ` John Floren
2011-01-14 4:31 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-14 4:35 ` Jacob Todd
2011-01-14 17:51 ` Bakul Shah
2011-01-14 17:54 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-14 18:14 ` Bakul Shah
2011-01-14 19:13 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-14 19:24 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-14 20:44 ` Bakul Shah
2011-01-14 18:15 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-01-14 18:14 ` Federico G. Benavento
2011-01-14 18:35 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-14 14:58 erik quanstrom
2011-01-14 17:14 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-14 17:40 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-14 18:58 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-14 19:09 ` erik quanstrom
2011-01-14 19:23 ` Charles Forsyth
2011-01-14 19:22 ` Duke Normandin
2011-01-15 0:16 ` Charles Forsyth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.00.1101131518440.4272@fryrpg-zna \
--to=dukeofperl@ml1.net \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).