From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 13:53:38 -0700 From: Lyndon Nerenberg To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: <249b2a9106d6258a2484fa9b14ecea0b@ladd.quanstro.net> Message-ID: References: <201107022036.52943.dexen.devries@gmail.com> <249b2a9106d6258a2484fa9b14ecea0b@ladd.quanstro.net> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (OSX 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [9fans] novel userspace paradigms introduced by plan 9 Topicbox-Message-UUID: f982207a-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > why do you think that the lack of a super user make per-process namespaces > work? The fact that you own the hardware you are running on means there's no need to provide enhanced priv's (such as root) to protect things like mount(2). And if you do something stupid, the only damage you can do is to yourself. Just look at all the hoops FUSE must jump through to keep people from being able to bodge the entire system.