From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu,  5 Jan 2012 13:50:48 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <b063397a2a7e3544a27211ec8af5dbd6@chula.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120105184858.87B0BB858@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <20120105124852.GA940@polynum.com>
	<20120105144810.182add7c@wks-ddc.exosec.local>
	<20120105151518.GB435@polynum.com>
	<CADSkJJXMBGnjtXbL5w+WMuxVbnW_+D6hQXYMN04wzYu+yXaCzA@mail.gmail.c>
	<74f17bd79e5a709683d94e72b4459623@lvoc.net>
	<20120105184858.87B0BB858@mail.bitblocks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] venti and "contrib": RFC
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 55c076f2-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> You'd save a bunch of energy if you only powered up venti
> disks once @ 4AM for a few minutes (and on demand when you
> look at /n/dump).  Though venti might have fits! And the disks
> might too! So may be this calls for a two level venti? First
> to an SSD RAID and a much less frequent venti/copy to hard
> disks.
>
> venti doesn't have a "scrub" command, does it? zfs scrub was
> instrumental in warning me that I needed new disks.

they're using coraid storage.  all this is taken care of for them
by the SR appliance.

- erik