From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon,  2 Feb 2015 19:52:08 -0800
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <b06e1288addd0e6e13f0e5221ba2830e@lilly.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <20150202212454.E6EBFB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <CANZw+5ea1Sc-ZAMR7QGo1zcsAfNddwYR4pENXKTEmuyRPJNEdg@mail.gmail.com>
	<408829c228f71cb5618e805b29547bd4@hamnavoe.com>
	<CAJSxfmLDdvQOt+MhWxTrmiHoM2kAFt8TbJpO2C_FjENX78Jbbw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150202212454.E6EBFB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Raspberry Pi 2 Model B
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3f5eeaea-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon Feb  2 13:20:08 PST 2015, bakul@bitblocks.com wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 20:54:02 GMT Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > hardkernel's odroid-c1 is similar and slightly better performance for the
> > same price; any sense which port might be easier?
>
> Odroid-c1 is Cortex-A5 while Pi2 is Cortex-A7 so Pi2 is more
> performant (but has worse ethernet and horrible usb). Port to
> pi2 should be easier as the periphs are the same as in Pi1;
> only their IO maps have changed a bit.

hmm.  the arch is just part of the story.  the odroid is 1500 MHz vs
the pi2's 900 MHz, and that's ddr3 vs ddr2.  so it's not quite all
stacked in one direction.

- erik