From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <b1b9fd6183cdddd0aeeee03502978488@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue,  7 Feb 2006 20:04:04 -0600
From: quanstro@quanstro.net
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] acme + mh
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f7420416-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

i have been using upas pretty much fulltime on p9p.
although the porting work isn't very presentable, 
faces, plumber, acme/mail, upas/^(alias fs marshal ned send smtp)
do work well enough to get by.

- erik

On Tue Feb  7 00:06:03 CST 2006, tim@nop.cx wrote:
> 
>     no and i wasn't suggesting that mh is capable of providing as a
>     rich an interface as upas/fs. just that it is what i prefer when
>     i can't use upas/fs, since people were asking. and Russ was
>     wondering if he was the only one around here using it. :)
>