From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <b264a90e165c80f5da8e84351220e8ae@caldo.demon.co.uk>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] shared memory
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <60c7fdf45121206846fb9f34f2588b77@collyer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:30:57 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 32400d60-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>>If you're looking for a way for unrelated processes to share memory, I
>>think your best bet is to use the undocumented S option of ramfs:

there is also segment(3), when configured.