From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 15:54:31 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <92606a17ce255a2e74049e4090d948b3@proxima.alt.za> <36c5eca0f06e9acbe2fac19067f457d8@ladd.quanstro.net> <20140519195016.B21E6B827@mail.bitblocks.com> <3a6dcbf0845989d60e627ad4e5df4313@ladd.quanstro.net> <3A01CE35-B176-4A24-B3D4-24AB0874BB48@9srv.net> <1c303148ec8dc74c876330176c2fa54c@mikro.quanstro.net> <20140520183259.Horde.rnYhhqisRVn0pKfceYI5jw1@ssl.eumx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] syscall 53 Topicbox-Message-UUID: ea648cb6-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Tue May 20 15:50:56 EDT 2014, rminnich@gmail.com wrote: > Ah well, back to 'm' for this thread, and I now accept that this > community is unwilling to solve this simple problem, as so many others > have. Bummer. nobody said that. there's a difference between noting a strawman argument, and pointing out that one feels that there is a different issue that's more important to solve, and being unwilling to address an issue. - erik