From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <b3b4f6f30604261314l18a62d27k55a353ac88391560@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:14:53 -0700
From: "Micah Stetson" <micah@stetsonnet.org>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] impressive
In-Reply-To: <775b8d190604261102k1e95d411x39c954aea86035f4@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <cc39734bed5352393b40f65a344378c2@quanstro.net>
	<20060426005301.GF27116@submarine>
	<57a21f730604251915y2344526ey629c2cb0de0055fb@mail.gmail.com>
	<b3b4f6f30604260939t3ad4d19ek131a37f9c4c3d7ee@mail.gmail.com>
	<775b8d190604261102k1e95d411x39c954aea86035f4@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 468cb796-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> which one do you think is growing faster - autoconf or gcc?
> or is there some symbiosis?

I don't know, but there's definitely a bug here:

% ./configure
...
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
...

Micah