From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <b3eb9bde18960e613ebdec606c41115c@caldo.demon.co.uk>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] same functions everywhere
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.1030508142422.20161A-100000@robin.cooper.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu,  8 May 2003 19:40:26 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a533bc1e-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>>Is there any data available on the exception handling in the new Limbo?
>>(syntax, implementation, etc)

i was planning to post my thoughts about the topic,
but i haven't had a chance to compose it yet.  i agreed with rob's
comments.  yet i had Limbo extended to support exceptions in
the language (they were already in the system).  is there a contradiction?
not really, but that's the bit i haven't had time to write yet!
i'll try to find time to do it tomorrow.