From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <b3fcf4bfa9bf9307b936e3cfebc5a79d@coraid.com>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Fri,  9 Feb 2007 11:30:51 -0500
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Anyone working on new upas/fs?
In-Reply-To: <ee9e417a0702090825ga73a760qa15f42557faa80db@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0fc8ca00-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

russ,

i believe it's better, but it's awful hard to retrofit everything that depends
on the format of upas/fs files.  ned, acme, faces, imap4d, pop3d, etc.  that seems like
too much disruption.  (but i'll bite if you rewrite all of upas :-).)

is there anything fundamentally incompatable in nfs?

- erik