From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <b4003ecfb5e7cde345b3c3fdc74231d7@collyer.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: inferno (was Re: [9fans] fortune-worthy)
From: Geoff Collyer <geoff@collyer.net>
In-Reply-To: <022801c3c559$8602af70$70079486@SOMA>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:44:43 -0800
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a8a120fc-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Limbo is arguably superior to C for writing at least some
applications, but that doesn't make the system that the BU got
originally superior to Plan 9.  There was no sam and no ed; how would
you have edited when running Inferno standalone (the only fair
comparison with Plan 9)?  That's just one of many such examples.