From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <b4a33c13d0a49d9e7ebd94a185f34593@plan9.bell-labs.com>
From: David Presotto <presotto@closedmind.org>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] IMAP clients and plan9 imap server
In-Reply-To: <86brsuyaqo.fsf@gic.mteege.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 16:58:56 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6c00d214-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

OK, I just looked through the mutt source.  It is incorrect.
Specificly, it will not recognize a reply like this:

* 26 FETCH (uid 6439 internaldate "10-Oct-2003 16:24:37 -0400" RFC822.SIZE 8883 body[HEADER.FIELDS ("DATE" "FROM" "SUBJECT" "TO" "CC" "MESSAGE-ID" "REFERENCES" "CONTENT-TYPE" "IN-REPLY-TO" "REPLY-TO" "LINES" "X-LABEL")] {1698}
...

Specificly, it can't put up with the body[...] part of the message.  This
actually exists in the spec (and is in fact in an example).  I'll fix their
code and send it to them.