9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Skip Tavakkolian" <fst@centurytel.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: The new ridiculous license
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 08:01:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6bdde97e8f67bfc83698b0e228361de@centurytel.net> (raw)

>> What we see from Lucent is typical corporate psychology. They're afraid to
>> let one iota more go than necessary to make a profit. It's hard to take
>> any argument or claim based on 'justify a trust' when the only issue at
>> hand is profit.
>
> We apologize for letting the code out with a license that obligates
> the receiver in any way.  I promise that with comments like this its
> not likely ever to happen again.

David, I think you should consider the source.  I, like most here, am grateful.

It seems to me counterproductive to keep looking for flaws in the
license when the intent has been clearly stated over and over again
that Lucent/Bell Labs wants Plan9 to be opensource.  It is always
about the intent.




             reply	other threads:[~2003-06-21 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-21 15:01 Skip Tavakkolian [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-20  5:01 [9fans] " Lucio De Re
2003-06-20 14:18 ` [9fans] " Jim Choate
2003-06-20 14:15   ` Lucio De Re
2003-06-20 16:44     ` Jim Choate
2003-06-20 17:06       ` Lucio De Re
2003-06-20 17:54         ` Jim Choate
2003-06-20 18:39           ` Stephen Wynne
2003-06-20 20:30             ` Jim Choate
2003-06-20 19:22           ` David Presotto
2003-06-20 19:38             ` nehal
2003-06-20 19:38             ` ron minnich
2003-06-20 18:57               ` Sam
2003-06-20 20:50                 ` Jim Choate
2003-06-20 23:46                   ` Steve Arons
2003-06-21  1:16                     ` northern snowfall
2003-06-21  3:16                     ` Jack Johnson
2003-06-20 19:58               ` Scott Schwartz
2003-06-21 10:42               ` bwc
2003-06-21 14:00                 ` Jim Choate
2003-06-20 20:12             ` Jason Gurtz
2003-06-20 20:46             ` Jim Choate
2003-06-20 22:22               ` Jon Snader
2003-06-21  0:45                 ` Tom Glinos
2003-06-21  9:16               ` Markus Friedl
2003-06-21  9:29                 ` Lucio De Re
2003-06-21 13:56                 ` Jim Choate
2003-06-23  7:39               ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2003-06-20 20:48             ` D. Brownlee
2003-06-22  3:10             ` a
2003-06-22  3:33               ` Christopher Nielsen
2003-06-22  4:41                 ` northern snowfall
2003-06-22 15:57                 ` Jon Snader
2003-06-22 22:13                   ` Dan Oglesby
2003-06-23  8:57             ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-06-23  9:02             ` bs
2003-06-23 11:22               ` matt
2003-06-23 11:36                 ` boyd, rounin
2003-06-23  8:57           ` Douglas A. Gwyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b6bdde97e8f67bfc83698b0e228361de@centurytel.net \
    --to=fst@centurytel.net \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).