From: "Navin Johnson" <navin.r.j@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] sources/contrib
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 05:55:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7ec34790711211255o69a7029ak5e7f2431e37ca721@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d375e920711210023n1d94f4b3uac47853b09c4b58b@mail.gmail.com>
On Nov 21, 2007 5:23 PM, Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com> wrote:
> please ignore anything I might ever say. (I even asked for the
> archives of 9trouble to
> be made public, but I guess even that was too radical an idea)
>
> But really, maybe asking for an issue tracking system is really
> crazy... specially when
> we can't even answer the most basic questions in 9fans, like 'what is
> the status of the
> amd64 port?'.
Does anyone see any merit in having a stacked mailing list? For
instance if you subscribe to 9-issues you'd receive 9trouble, 9fans
and plan9-announce mailing lists.
plan9-announce
9fans (for general discussions)
9trouble (for troubleshooting problems)
9-issues (for issue tracking ml)
It's just a thought.
Navin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-21 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-20 15:46 Federico Benavento
2007-11-20 15:53 ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-20 15:57 ` Federico Benavento
2007-11-20 18:31 ` Uriel
2007-11-20 18:58 ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-21 3:08 ` lucio
2007-11-20 19:30 ` Gabriel Diaz
2007-11-20 20:21 ` David Leimbach
2007-11-20 21:09 ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-20 21:36 ` Uriel
2007-11-20 21:46 ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-20 22:04 ` anyrhine
2007-11-20 23:57 ` Federico Benavento
2007-11-21 0:01 ` erik quanstrom
2007-11-20 22:42 ` David Leimbach
2007-11-20 23:09 ` dave.l
2007-11-20 23:59 ` David Leimbach
2007-11-21 8:23 ` Uriel
2007-11-21 10:06 ` Robert Raschke
2007-11-21 14:30 ` David Leimbach
2007-11-21 15:33 ` Uriel
2007-11-21 21:08 ` Navin Johnson
2007-11-21 22:59 ` Uriel
2007-11-21 20:55 ` Navin Johnson [this message]
2007-11-22 15:44 ` Russ Cox
2007-11-22 19:48 ` Uriel
2007-11-21 0:04 ` Steve Simon
2007-11-20 19:29 Erik Quanstrom
2021-01-26 22:01 Pouya Tafti
2021-01-26 22:23 ` sirjofri
2021-01-26 23:10 ` Pouya Tafti
2021-01-26 23:28 ` Pouya Tafti
2021-01-26 22:33 ` David du Colombier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b7ec34790711211255o69a7029ak5e7f2431e37ca721@mail.gmail.com \
--to=navin.r.j@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).