From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sun,  8 Jun 2014 13:06:01 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <b82bb4ded2d9b768c4a5a3694d738c1b@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <20140608165601.19C4DB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <CAGMcHPqOp2ovwZK93DWMKyUkZpPJTSZwA4dZNWsYMOxyz8MUeQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140608070355.A8B9DB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<7079be645c14ed97b4fea23029d25283@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<20140608165601.19C4DB827@mail.bitblocks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Question about fossil
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f7d04a34-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> The last time I measured this (Aug 2012) raw disk write was
> 10MB/s, file writes were 2MB/s. On the same h/w & disk linux
> got 25MB/s (don't recall file throughput). And Linux gets
> 11.3MB/s ethernet throughput compared 3.7MB/s on 9pi (both
> with ttcp). Linux tcp throughput is close to linespeed.

i can push the usb hard enough to trigger bugs.  :-)
i usually get about 6MB/s.

there's only one trick: use qmalloc instead of pool.
pool astounds with its slowness.  the code is in 9atom.

- erik