From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:52:27 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <b938a449d57f533665ca616cb7a998a8@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100330193718.GA3120@polynum.com>
References: <20100330193718.GA3120@polynum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] ken-cc, 64 bits machine, and 32 bits integers
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f9e6d39a-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> 1) If a compiler set on a 32 bits machine, "long" to be 64 bits? (I
> haven't looked at the sources, but I guess it is not the case for ken-cc
> suite).
>
> 2) On a 64 bits (since Charles Forsyth has done work for amd64 at least
> on ken-cc, this exists), I imagine "long" is an octa (64 bits).

with kenc, long === 32 bits even on 64 bit machines; there is no
difference in storage size between long and int.

- erik