From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:37:53 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <b9490912ea68925d8f154747e0cde74c@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120112232520.3bda7423@gmail.com>
References: <20120110024048.GA407@polynum.com>
	<20120109232333.1d847e92@gmail.com>
	<20120110171129.GD344@polynum.com>
	<20120110144719.2c67cd9e@wks-ddc.exosec.local>
	<20120113183323.GA971@polynum.com>
	<20120112222919.0bb0c261@gmail.com>
	<3eb11f2e864fe9cca8328d06bbdbf825@chula.quanstro.net>
	<20120112232520.3bda7423@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil (again)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 59ca9552-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu Jan 12 17:26:35 EST 2012, 0intro@gmail.com wrote:
> > why will -h make a difference?  i don't see it in the code.
>
> It's more convenient. But why this question?
> It doesn't matter anyway.

i read your email as implying that -h returned substantively
different results than otherwise.

i guess i just misinterpreted what you were saying.

- erik