From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:21:58 +0800 From: "Hongzheng Wang" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] How to move to rc from sh/bash In-Reply-To: <7420c84252850512236ab0ad6ce98879@quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7420c84252850512236ab0ad6ce98879@quanstro.net> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4d6725d6-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Thank you for your information. It is quite useful. I will have a browse for these documents first. On Feb 9, 2008 5:00 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: > tom duff's original paper is in /sys/doc/rc.ps. i don't think i can > make a better argument for rc than that. personally, i think the > regularized grammer and quoting pay big dividends. rc is also > small. it's not hard to understand the virtual machine its built > around. but you'll need to decide for your self. -- HZ