From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 02:35:22 -0500 From: quanstro@quanstro.net To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] 3 questions In-Reply-To: <447BCB5E.8040206@lanl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5828db10-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 seppuku. On Mon May 29 23:45:44 CDT 2006, rminnich@lanl.gov wrote: > lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote: > > > Well, what's so bad about editing raw HTML? It is considerably more > > embarrassing to publish the type of unreadable trash (only its mother > > could love that HTML!) produced by the average HTML editor. Take a > > look, sometimes. > > It's not me. It's a user. This is a very common problem. I just edit > html myself. But I was wondering if there was something more acceptable > under plan 9 than raw html. > > thanks > > ron