From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <b9f493d189a685b6c98a480c4bde7854@hamnavoe.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: Richard Miller <9fans@hamnavoe.com>
Date: Tue,  8 Jan 2013 19:38:03 +0000
In-Reply-To: <405E9E9F-88BA-4024-BE88-3D270968E99C@lsub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] these are release of 9front?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0434ddd6-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> At the time, the idea was just to have a single binary (usbd) carrying the usb
> stuff. Because using multiple ones implied that the kernel (usbd was at /boot)
> had multiple copies of the same libraries for each different binary.

When we worry about multiple copies of the same library code, sometimes the
answer is to abstract the library functionality into another fileserver.
Is there a way we could invent another usb driver layer to do that?