From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <bb9aee10804160952k295e737m40d056ceb389bfc2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:52:59 -0400
From: "Michaelian Ennis" <michaelian.ennis@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <2325a9806a9bf5b576674c8b648758e9@terzarima.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20080416133300.E90521E8C3A@holo.morphisms.net>
	<2325a9806a9bf5b576674c8b648758e9@terzarima.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] telnet vs. godaddy whois
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8ef39052-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
> > Plan 9 ignores the zero length window and sends a single byte (2456ms),
>  > causing godaddy to hang up (2493ms).
>
>  it is probing the zero window (rfc793, section 3.7)

Not that I think that fingerprinting is definitive but nmap thinks
whois at godaddy is running:

Captor embedded, QNX 4.X

Ian