From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <bc53cd6915806f4d29d31d6adf6377ce@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] SCSI or IDE? 
From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 18:45:04 +0900
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 87b5d1f4-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> However, it strikes me that a lot of this is quite literally, read-only
> access.  Does fossil make sense in those environments?  Or would I be
> better off with a standalone FS+CPU server combination?

In addtion, I'm anxious of what rog said here before.
Something like venti+fossil is slower than kfs system on his notebook. ☺

I know kfs is very slow when compared with my real file server with SCSI
disks.   So, if venti+fossil is slower than kfs, hmmm...

By the way, in venti document, there is a point to make it faster by
separating index and log.

Kenji