From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: SMTP+SPF (was: [9fans] Re: new release?) From: Geoff Collyer In-Reply-To: <1077817415.3851.136.camel@zevon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:01:31 -0800 Topicbox-Message-UUID: fbb3ee14-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Dave, my dns is reporting a delegation loop for anvil.com, so I can't get mail to you. cpu Feb 26 13:52:01 delegation loop anvil.com ns pri2.dns.uk.psi.net -> ns f.root-servers.net from 154.32.107.30 cpud Feb 26 13:52:03 delegation loop anvil.com ns wonderwall.anvil.com -> ns f.root-servers.net from 154.32.107.30 You have my sympathies; sendmail and named should be taken out back and shot; that would eliminate most of the buffer overflows on (l)unix systems. Buffer overflows are not inevitable, they are the product of careless programming. Let me once again plug Dave Presotto's string(2) library: string(2): avoiding buffer overruns in upas since 1984