From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <bd0c0a18c16c2b6fcf07ea7937c582da@collyer.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] impressive
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:48:00 -0700
From: geoff@collyer.net
In-Reply-To: <cc39734bed5352393b40f65a344378c2@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 46109e36-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>>From memory and a quick scan of gcc(1) since I don't have time to read
the entire manual ``page'' now, `gcc -ansi -pedantic' should compile
exactly 1990 ISO C and `gcc --std=c99 -pedantic' should compile
exactly 1999 ISO C. Using -pedantic-errors instead of -pedantic will
produce fatal errors rather than warnings for using extensions.