From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <bd65ed61847a1e7cdca4690feae384f6@terzarima.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] QTCTL?
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>
Date: Thu,  1 Nov 2007 17:16:13 +0000
In-Reply-To: <c3ec554ca97908421fd33a123ff9b825@terzarima.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e3afbef0-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> sorry: i was assuming that when needed the client (or rather a cache control agent on the client)
> would acknowledge by writing back on the file.

actually any service-specific agent on the client, it's not just for cache control,
which is one reason i like it more than cache-specific things actually in the protocol.