Re: [9fans] Bitsy armpaq.proto

["rob pike, esq." <rob@plan9.bell-labs.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 372 bytes --]

This looks much closer to the full script.  Again for space reasons,
we didn't package binaries for the other compilers, so you must build
them first (with objtype=386).  Then you can build the libraries and
user-level programs.  But the bitsy kernel needs booting stuff, so you
must then build in /sys/src/boot/arm before you can build in
/sys/src/9/bitsy.

-rob

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1899 bytes --]

From: andrey mirtchovski <andrey@lanl.gov>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Bitsy armpaq.proto
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 09:41:09 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <20020428093158.U563-100000@fbsd.acl.lanl.gov>


if you're talking about mk-ing the distribution, it fails because 5[acl]
binaries are not included.. something like this will succesfully compile
the bitsy port:

#!/bin/rc
objtype=386
for (i in /sys/src/cmd/5*) { cd $i && mk install }
objtype=arm
cd /sys/src/ && mk install
cd /sys/src/boot/arm && mk install
cd /sys/src/9/bitsy && mk

On Sun, 28 Apr 2002 plan9@itic.ca wrote:

>
> :-) Don't try it, you may be surprised...
>