From: Geoff Collyer <geoff@collyer.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 Usenix BOF, 12 June 2003
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 17:45:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be53f2d34949d6d8da6ac6664c5c1e15@collyer.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a89b7388aa862508e4a9a73b9572dc0f@collyer.net>
I apologise for the duplicated mail due to the alias 9fans@collyer.net
that got into mail headers (rather than being expanded); it's now
gone.
I hadn't intended to start a war; this is what I wrote:
``It might be worth pointing the OpenBSD folks at this licence if
they are serious about using the Plan 9 C compilers.''
That was just my thought in my personal notes and does not represent
anybody else's thoughts. That quote is based on some interest
expressed by the OpenBSD folks a few months back (more or less)
suggesting that they might use the Plan 9 compilers if the licence
were more liberal (my interpretation). It appeared that the new
licence was more liberal, given that the OSI had blessed much of it.
That's all. Nobody's mortgage was threatened and no one was
threatened with rape. I don't read the plan-9-licence mailing list,
so I'm undoubtedly out of touch with current licensing theology (no
pun intended).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-18 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-16 23:43 Geoff Collyer
2003-06-16 23:51 ` ron minnich
2003-06-17 2:24 ` Russ Cox
2003-06-17 3:22 ` northern snowfall
2003-06-17 2:39 ` Russ Cox
2003-06-17 3:39 ` northern snowfall
2003-06-18 0:45 ` Geoff Collyer [this message]
2003-06-18 0:53 ` George Michaelson
2003-06-18 5:53 ` boyd, rounin
2003-06-18 1:08 ` [9fans] " Jim Choate
2003-06-18 1:06 ` David Presotto
2003-06-18 1:09 ` Dan Cross
2003-06-17 17:54 [9fans] " Todd C. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be53f2d34949d6d8da6ac6664c5c1e15@collyer.net \
--to=geoff@collyer.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).