From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <be851551352d02d8449d93c74b1a676a@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat,  8 Apr 2006 18:50:01 -0500
From: quanstro@quanstro.net
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Good enough approximation for ape/pcc
In-Reply-To: <44383BB4.8040302@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3344cfe8-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

__func__ looks like preprocessor magic, but must actually be implemented
as a magic variable in the compiler.  imho, i think the standards committ=
ee
missed that one.  it's pretty ugly.

is there a good argument for having __func__?  it's not generally in the=20
plan 9 style to put stuff like that in code. =20

i suppose you're expected to know how to read kmesg output and sic acid=20
after the offender.  =E2=98=BA

- erik

On Sat Apr  8 17:41:43 CDT 2006, viriketo@gmail.com wrote:

> Russ Cox wrote:
> >>Does pcc do C99?  Anyone know how much or how little?
> >=20
> >=20
> > See /sys/src/cmd/cc/c99.
> I'm courious, why has been __func__ declared unwanted?
>=20