9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan 9 overcommits memory?
Date: Fri,  7 Sep 2007 06:55:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf14a1afa9d2da2c6b1540a16c52d970@quanstro.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <775b8d190709062109o1c0a64b8y55ceb79e95083ecb@mail.gmail.com>

> this thread is now twice as big as the swap and proc code.
> is it really that much fun to do research this way?
> yes, it has been done.  no, my current work has nothing
> to do with this issue.
>
> someone written a line of relevant code during this "discussion"?

would you care to give references to this being done
in plan 9 or similar operating system?

i would hope the discussion is much bigger than the
resulting code.  this discussion has boiled down the
issues for me.  this is what i remember

plan 9 overcommits memory three ways
1. when a process forks, the cow pages are counted once.
2. plan 9 hands out brk'ed pages it doesn't have.
3. the stack is potentially very large (16mb), grown
implictly and not reserved.

by the way, what are the scare quote quotes for?
participants might take that in the wrong way.

- erik



  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-07 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-03  3:38 geoff
2007-09-03  5:35 ` Scott Schwartz
2007-09-03  6:05   ` Uriel
2007-09-03 13:33   ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-03 17:09     ` john
2007-09-03 17:17       ` Gorka Guardiola
2007-09-03 17:25         ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2007-09-03 17:30         ` john
2007-09-03 19:47           ` Charles Forsyth
2007-09-03 19:46         ` Uriel
2007-09-03 19:54           ` Charles Forsyth
2007-09-03 19:54             ` Uriel
2007-09-03 20:34               ` geoff
2007-09-03 20:16             ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-03 17:32       ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-03 17:39         ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2007-09-03 17:43         ` john
2007-09-03 17:45           ` john
2007-09-03 19:52             ` Charles Forsyth
2007-09-05  8:33         ` sqweek
2007-09-04  8:48       ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2007-09-03 18:13   ` geoff
2007-09-03 20:17     ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-03 20:48       ` geoff
2007-09-03 22:01         ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-03 22:43           ` Charles Forsyth
2007-09-03 23:51             ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-04  0:04               ` Charles Forsyth
2007-09-04 14:44                 ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-04 15:07                   ` Charles Forsyth
2007-09-04 15:18                     ` ron minnich
2007-09-04 15:18                     ` Charles Forsyth
2007-09-05  8:48                       ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2007-09-05 10:53                         ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-06  8:42                           ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2007-09-06 17:15                             ` Joel C. Salomon
2007-09-06 19:38                               ` ron minnich
2007-09-06 20:18                                 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-09-06 23:37                                 ` Steve Simon
2007-09-07  3:09                                 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2007-09-07  4:09                                   ` Bruce Ellis
2007-09-07  4:25                                     ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2007-09-07  4:37                                       ` Bruce Ellis
2007-09-07  4:43                                         ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2007-09-10 15:24                                         ` roger peppe
2007-09-07 10:55                                     ` erik quanstrom [this message]
2007-09-04 23:32                     ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-03 21:16       ` Charles Forsyth
2007-09-03 21:19         ` ron minnich
2007-09-03 21:41           ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-09-03 21:51           ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-03 13:21 ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-03 14:01   ` Sape Mullender
2007-09-03 14:32     ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-03 15:28       ` Sape Mullender
2007-09-04  4:32         ` lucio
2007-09-04  7:23 ` Dave Eckhardt
2007-09-04  8:48 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-31 11:41 erik quanstrom
2007-09-02 21:27 ` Russ Cox
2007-09-03  0:43   ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-04  8:47     ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2007-09-04 13:39       ` David Leimbach
2007-09-04 14:41         ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-04 15:54           ` David Leimbach
2007-09-04 17:37     ` sqweek
2007-09-04 18:10       ` ron minnich
2007-09-04 18:53         ` sqweek
2007-09-03  1:23   ` Scott Schwartz
2007-09-03  1:47     ` ron minnich
2007-09-03  2:11       ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-03  2:11       ` erik quanstrom
2007-09-04  8:48         ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2007-09-03  5:28       ` Scott Schwartz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bf14a1afa9d2da2c6b1540a16c52d970@quanstro.net \
    --to=quanstro@quanstro.net \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).