From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu,  3 Feb 2011 08:59:44 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <bfde6187a7802968b6bccc745bef3152@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <201102031440.16555.dexen.devries@gmail.com>
References: <201102031245.33842.dexen.devries@gmail.com>
	<6067898fb2c004aedabecd83cd0be2ac@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<201102031440.16555.dexen.devries@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] files vs. directories
Topicbox-Message-UUID: aab1605a-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> How about 8c(1)? would it be too confusing to issue:
> 8c foo.c
> if `foo.c' contained some C code, AND `foo.c/bar.h' contained some more C
> code?
>
> rc(1)? How could `. foo.rc'  handle situation when also `foo.rc/bar.rc/baz.rc'
> exists?

exactly.  this is the same problem one has with arbitrary attributes.

- erik