From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <c04c1c506eacaea4e4a8c93658da233d@terzarima.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] QTCTL?
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>
Date: Thu,  1 Nov 2007 11:19:44 +0000
In-Reply-To: <a4e6962a0711010403r71ad58dclae38b97adfc263b2@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e2b146cc-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

i'd often mount each distinct underlying thing separately, not just
for cache control but to select the right type of connection for each,
or to get better bandwidth than could be achieved with just one connection.
if a service is aggregating some others, and the connection classes
are otherwise the same, then i'd have that service talk to the client
side cache services to provide them with its own cache constraints.
(and so on)