From: Geoff Collyer <geoff@collyer.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] dup vs QTAUTH
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:17:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0dfcf5809f384b8c2b76dd013e06d32@collyer.net> (raw)
Does anybody know why dup(2) appears to permit
dupping a file descriptor for a QTAUTH file, but
dup(3) gives Eperm?
reply other threads:[~2004-04-02 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c0dfcf5809f384b8c2b76dd013e06d32@collyer.net \
--to=geoff@collyer.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).