From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <c0ee4b2b6ef7b9c504fecf4d51814930@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:37:26 -0600
From: quanstro@quanstro.net
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] asn.1 alternatives
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fc2630ce-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

i've done this before. (but i wasn't responsible for the exchange half.)
it actually worked better than exchange-only because sendmail is
(was) much better at dealing with smtp mail.

- erik

On Sat Feb 11 10:24:28 CST 2006, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:

> than usual because I'll insist in front-ending Exchange with the
> existing Sendmail installation, modified in haste to deliver to
> Exchange instead of the local mailboxes.  All sorts of extremely fancy
> features of Exchange will be used and the reliability of the existing
> system will soon will be forgotten.
> 
>