From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: To: dvd@davidashen.net, 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] graphviz-1.10 port From: dbailey27@ameritech.net In-Reply-To: <200403080612.i286CmXb083675@adat.davidashen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-mlulikphxsmnpiakmvbbozwoel" Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:11:54 -0500 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 215df4fc-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-mlulikphxsmnpiakmvbbozwoel Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Should you rewrite scan.l in lex, too? Yes. Or at least remove cleaning it from the makefile so you don't screw your users. --upas-mlulikphxsmnpiakmvbbozwoel Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline X-Apparently-To: dbailey27@ameritech.net via web80507.mail.yahoo.com; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 22:14:25 -0800 Return-Path: <9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu> Received: from mx1-chcgil.chcgil.ameritech.net (206.141.192.66) by mta809.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sun, 07 Mar 2004 22:14:25 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [130.203.4.6] Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.4.6]) by mx1-chcgil.chcgil.ameritech.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i286EOkO012486 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 00:14:24 -0600 (CST) Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 7BD7019BBC; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:14:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.4.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 5EDBE19B18; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:14:13 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 0238719BF7; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:13:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from adat.davidashen.net (unknown [217.113.20.242]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 724F219AD7 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:13:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from adat.davidashen.net (localhost.davidashen.net [127.0.0.1]) by adat.davidashen.net (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i286Cmiq083676 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:12:48 +0400 (AMT) (envelope-from dvd@adat.davidashen.net) Received: (from dvd@localhost) by adat.davidashen.net (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id i286CmXb083675 for 9fans@cse.psu.edu; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:12:48 +0400 (AMT) From: David Tolpin Message-Id: <200403080612.i286CmXb083675@adat.davidashen.net> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] graphviz-1.10 port In-Reply-To: <7a682bfdaa722f04b826e3b3851a7a28@plan9.ucalgary.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:12:48 +0400 (AMT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on psuvax1.cse.psu.edu X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: > > Now, when the code is working, either the poster of the remark, > > or any other volunteer, is welcome to re-arrange and rewrite the > > make process. > > the code isn't working. Only because you run 'make clean'. graphviz distribution includes scan.c generated from scan.l (from research.att.com, not my port), because scan.l requires flex, not lex. Should I rewrite scan.l in lex too? > secondly you replace: In what respect will it make the program better? --upas-mlulikphxsmnpiakmvbbozwoel--