From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:34:39 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Help with two small shared file servers Topicbox-Message-UUID: 141b36c4-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Ken's FS serves only 9P and can be a hassle to set up and get going. > In my opinion, if you can live without ephemeral snapshots, just run > fossil+venti with snapshots turned off, which should eliminate the > stability complaint. since it's job is to be a plan 9 file server, this should be neither surprising nor limiting. > slower than transferring via HTTP. When I tested 9P vs. HTTP over > connections with 25 ms latency (50ms RTT), I saw a 4x slowdown versus > HTTP. Even at 15 ms RTT, transfers took twice as long. did you do testing at regular lan latencies? what i see on my networks is usually <= 30µs. - erik