From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <c2ceaacb89ecc821d1440ad1e1d34d96@coraid.com>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Mon,  3 Sep 2007 17:51:16 -0400
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan 9 overcommits memory?
In-Reply-To: <13426df10709031419n16ae32f2i109d1be5948d074b@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b6b34f20-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> One option for Erik: try changing the segment allocator so that it
> faults in all segment pages on creation. Would this do what you want?
> I will try this if I get time later today. Assuming it is as simple as
> my simple-minded description makes it sound.

grudgingly, i admit it would -- assuming that malloc then returns 0 and
doesn't send the proc a note.

you've got me motivated to think about this some more.

- erik