9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: rvs@sun.com, 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] Quick question on stopping a process that waits for IO
Date: Fri,  7 Nov 2008 07:17:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c36242ab33e54d1d7f3e89888f03cb56@quanstro.net> (raw)

> >> The target process is *already* waiting for the IO stuck inside the
> >> kernel. It is not on a runqueue, not it is considered to be places
> >> there.
> >
> > since procwrite doesn't acquire anything other than the debug lock,
> > how do you know?  the proc could start up again before you notice.
>
> How? If there's a stop message already written to /proc/n/ctl. Once
> that is done, the process is guaranteed to be in 2 states and those
> states only: continue waiting for the I/O, being actually Stopped.
> Both of the don't let the scheduler take it to the runqueue.

here's the senerio, i think  (works fine on a single processor)
a			b
acquire debug lock
sleep			complete io
			sched
			run a bit
			syscall
wakeup

- erik



             reply	other threads:[~2008-11-07 12:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-07 12:17 erik quanstrom [this message]
     [not found] <507c066f8ade431cfb2d23a36aa82837@quanstro.net>
2008-11-07 18:57 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-07 11:57 erik quanstrom
2008-11-03  5:55 Roman Shaposhnik
2008-11-04  0:51 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-11-04 12:34   ` erik quanstrom
2008-11-07  5:51     ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-11-04  1:01 ` ron minnich
2008-11-05  2:00   ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-11-05  4:00     ` erik quanstrom
2008-11-05  4:47       ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-11-05  4:01     ` erik quanstrom
2008-11-05  4:22       ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-11-05 12:55         ` erik quanstrom
2008-11-07  5:48           ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-11-06  5:40 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2008-11-07  5:18   ` Roman Shaposhnik
2008-11-07  6:03     ` Nathaniel W Filardo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c36242ab33e54d1d7f3e89888f03cb56@quanstro.net \
    --to=quanstro@quanstro.net \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    --cc=rvs@sun.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).