From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: To: 9fans@9fans.net From: Charles Forsyth Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:49:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20080416194804.E3B735B54@mail.bitblocks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] telnet vs. godaddy whois Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8f190922-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Er... "correct" seems a bit strong. Why is Plan9 sending one > byte of data when it knows the receiver's window is closed? read the section of the rfc i mentioned earlier. it probably ought to probe only after a retransmission timeout period, but that's not a predetermined value, and can be short. very short. and plan 9 is positively curt, so it's just typical that others should then complain.