From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <c3ec554ca97908421fd33a123ff9b825@terzarima.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] QTCTL?
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>
Date: Thu,  1 Nov 2007 17:13:02 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20071101170234.13E9E1E8C55@holo.morphisms.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e3abdede-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> That's why a change file doesn't
> provide the same consistency guarantees as pushing
> all reads/writes to the file server.  To get those, revocations

sorry: i was assuming that when needed the client (or rather a cache control agent on the client)
would acknowledge by writing back on the file.