From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu From: Bengt Kleberg Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <405D1F63.5010002@swtch.com>, <200403221630.i2MGUf511738@zamenhof.cs.utwente.nl> Subject: Re: [9fans] acme, rio workalike available in plan 9 ports Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:59:18 +0000 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3d8f247a-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Axel Belinfante wrote: ...deleted > Tried building all (esp. acme) on SunOS 5.8. > Build works best with gcc. > Anybody else trying the stuff on SunOS 5.8? i am running SunOS 5.8 as my only system (at work). i found that sun cc (Forte/6u2/SUNWspro/bin/cc) does not accept some plan9 cc contructs. ramfs.c has char *(*fcalls[])(Fid*) = { [Tversion] rversion, where [Tversion] is not understood. moreover, there are some files where plan9 cc allows a cast to a struct, which sun cc does not allow. one example, acme.c, has rs = cleanrname((Runestr){rb, nr}); > Got a number of warnings, and some 'fatal' problems: > no futimesat for lib9/dirfwstat.c (could not find futimes at all) > no TIOCGWINSZ for cmd/mc.c (needs using gcc it is possible to get this far. note that mc.c also is missing a struct winsize it too is found in . ...deleted > If more info is needed to track this down, I'm happy to help. add me to the list of happy to help'ers. bengt This communication is confidential and intended solely for the addressee(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you believe this message has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender by replying to this transmission and delete the message without disclosing it. Thank you. E-mail including attachments is susceptible to data corruption, interruption, unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we only send and receive e-mails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses or any consequences thereof.