From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <c44e01d0f480a2fba457c2756dd7140b@swtch.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] bug in asm.ps
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@swtch.com>
Date: Mon,  6 Mar 2006 11:17:52 -0500
In-Reply-To: <dc32fda15071d82aa3d6be853eac99c5@coraid.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0c8cad80-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I still don't know what you think is wrong.
Are you referring to the order in which stack
variables are allocated in the stack frame?
(I thought you were referring to the placement
of temporaries to hold function call parameters.)
All the compilers allocate their stack frames the
same way, as far as I can tell.  But I don't see
asm.ps making claims about what the correspondence
between assembly and C is.  First and last
depend on your point of view.

Russ