From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <c53d7912a3c2e7bd1aa1d804510f293d@krabbe.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:30:03 +0200
From: Ingo Krabbe <ikrabbe.ask@gmail.com>
To: <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <befefe5d1d77650a94d37074e2c8fc6b@brasstown.quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] sam resizing
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8809beb0-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue Oct 22 08:19:47 CES 2013, quanstro@quanstro.net wrote:
> so i'm wondering.  acme does a good job of auto layout.
> the thing acme lacks is a edit buffer (~~sam~~).  so maybe
> it would be fruitful to add edit buffer(s) to acme?
>
> - erik

I don't think its good to compare acme and sam as the approaches are quite different and both tools are useful.
Actually I use acme sometimes as a file browser or remote command windowBut when I work on source code I don't like, for example, that my mouse cursor in acme needs to float over the window I type in.

cheers,

ingo