From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <c58b317a0711071424y3155e1adk327b16ab4afd301a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed,  7 Nov 2007 23:24:16 +0100
From: "david jeannot" <djeannot24@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Channels and threads
In-Reply-To: <473235F0.80107@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <13edbccfbea367d2454018035c47ad0c@quanstro.net>
	<473235F0.80107@gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ee47018e-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Well, yeah, I get that. I think the question I need to
> ask is "why use Channels at all?"

"It's remarkably easy to write software this way."
quoted from rob pike in "Rio: Design of a Concurrent Window"