From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <c65bb4506db50b80642b39f4ee86c765@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Evolving rio / GUI development
From: Kenji Okamoto <okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:10:27 +0900
In-Reply-To: <9c2013c293e670c04339d7ef48bf74a8@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0cabef02-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Although take a rest by using web browse is a usual play to me, too.=E2=
=98=BA
> However, this is not a serious problem, if we think the computer for so=
mething
> work.   However, if it doesn't make any problem, it's not bad to have v=
irtual
> desktops in Plan 9, I agree.

When I wrote this, I was reading "why Europa has strike-slip fault things=
 paper", and
failed to concentrate myself.    After had a lunch and joyful playing tal=
ks, I rethinked
"hide" operation must be enough for this purpose.   Is there any other re=
ason why
we should have virtual desktop for Plan 9?

Kenji