From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <c79a2bd137dfa9b96666dfd1e75d504b@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 20:19:52 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20120828174621.GB12589@intma.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] rc vs sh
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b1961a54-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> My only actual statement is that a better
> solution would be de-shitting the build process so that it doesn't
> require such a precise set of software to operate.

Does that translate into being able to supply an example of such a
"de-shitting" process the Go Team could and should have followed?  An
irresistible paragon of building prowess?  Something even the autoconf
people would be tempted to follow?

++L