From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] double trouble From: Fco.J.Ballesteros In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-pvbpfgwyjsdcxmojenxwippvtr" Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:52:29 +0100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9ed1ed54-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-pvbpfgwyjsdcxmojenxwippvtr Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Perhaps I'm picky. But I'd suggest changing the lock file to be /mail/box/$user/Lock Then it'd be clear that it does not refer to mbox in particular. Thanks for the fix anyway. --upas-pvbpfgwyjsdcxmojenxwippvtr Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by aquamar; Wed Dec 10 15:33:37 MET 2003 Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 91A5919D82; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:33:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.30.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id D2F4119D8B; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:33:09 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 4CB2919D81; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:32:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com (plan9.bell-labs.com [204.178.31.2]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 53C0B19A6A for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:32:12 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: From: David Presotto To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] double trouble In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-iblcqvuuyprstnpzahmmgprnav" Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:32:10 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-iblcqvuuyprstnpzahmmgprnav Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A dichotomy twixt tools that shouldn't be there. It looks like upas/fs always locks L.mbox but that upas/deliver and upas/send lock the file L.(basename of mailbox being used). Usually, they're the same but if we're delivering into other mailboxes, they aren't. I'll make everything lock /mail/box//L.mbox and avoid the problem all together. I'll run it locally for a while since I'm sure to generate at least one deadlock along the way. --upas-iblcqvuuyprstnpzahmmgprnav Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.9.2]) by plan9; Wed Dec 10 09:17:31 EST 2003 Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by plan9; Wed Dec 10 09:17:29 EST 2003 Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 75EB919D86; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:17:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.30.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 02F6619D7F; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:17:07 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 95B2519D86; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:16:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from t40.swtch.com (node-40245942.bos.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.89.66]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 0BA1E19D7E for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:16:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=t40.swtch.com) by t40.swtch.com with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AU58Z-000CsS-2e for 9fans@cse.psu.edu; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:16:23 -0500 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] double trouble In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:02:32." From: "Russ Cox" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <49502.1071065780.1@t40.swtch.com> Message-Id: Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:16:20 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) > The attached mail from 'caldo.demon.co.uk!forsyth' > to 'plan9.bell-labs.com!9trouble' alias `local!9trouble' > failed with error '/bin/upas/deliver: opening mailbox: permission denied'. > > > the gist of the message (which i've resent to another address) > was: if you use filterkit's pipeto with > if(isspam) > spool /mail/box/$USER/spam > ensure chmod a+rw on /mail/box/$USER/L.spam > or each delivery of spam will take a little time. Note that this says L.spam and not L.mbox, a fact that I completely missed on first few readings. Russ --upas-iblcqvuuyprstnpzahmmgprnav-- --upas-pvbpfgwyjsdcxmojenxwippvtr--