From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622)
In-Reply-To: <3c689e333f7c49b26a5ea9493ab67d2c@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
References: <aa47b632762c98bb2fcc239a5ae17eef@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
	<20050715183006.GA21802@augusta.math.psu.edu>
	<3c689e333f7c49b26a5ea9493ab67d2c@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <c7fa037379cdacafd309cc3b810bb984@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: arisawa@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp
Subject: Re: [9fans] #!/bin/foo
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 07:40:39 +0900
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 680d0e62-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I said:

> Yes I know that, but I have experienced such an endless loop
> using only binary executables. the kernel crushed.
> of course the logic was not so simple.
>

sorry, the situation might have been somewhat different.

the current kernel codes manipulates both executable binary
and executable script in exec system call.
how about bringing executable script parts to library ?
that is, introducing low level _exec that handles only binary
and we have exec in libray.
then, I guess, we can get more flexibility.

Kenji Arisawa