From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 22:24:01 +0530 From: Mayuresh Kathe To: Federico Benavento In-Reply-To: References: <84052108-743E-449F-914B-9BF20E3DD4A1@gmail.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] Rc port. Topicbox-Message-UUID: f401a212-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 okay, in that case, would you be in a position to add-in the excellent=20 enhancements you made to your copy to the "rc" in plan9port? On 2019-01-24 10:02 PM, Federico Benavento wrote: > Oh, maybe it wasn=E2=80=99t so obvious, but this copy has edit, history= and > completion which can be customized by defining a fn complete{} > function. >=20 >> On Jan 24, 2019, at 1:25 PM, Federico Benavento =20 >> wrote: >>=20 >> I just wanted the shell, not the whole thing, it=E2=80=99s a port, bec= ause I=20 >> started from the copy in /sys/src/cmd/, >> I didn=E2=80=99t want to use es either. >>=20 >>> On Jan 24, 2019, at 12:01 AM, Mayuresh Kathe =20 >>> wrote: >>>=20 >>> On 2019-01-24 03:09 AM, Federico Benavento wrote: >>>> Hola, >>>> I just uploaded a standalone unix (only tested on macOS/Linux) port >>>> with edit, history and completion support to GitHub. >>>> I have been using it as my primary shell for months on macOS and=20 >>>> it=E2=80=99s >>>> seems to be working pretty well. >>>=20 >>> not undermining your efforts, but isn't a port of "rc" a part of=20 >>> plan9ports?